Some of what I’ve written in books and essays has surely roused a reader’s urge to tell me things. Most of those readers are not like the editors or reviewers that people will pay money to read, so it may be difficult for an amateur critic to tell authors anything helpful about their work. (Be assured that “I didn’t like it” isn’t very helpful.
What authors need is feedback, but it may come across as blowback. Of course, blowback is fun, which is reason enough to do it, I suppose. But what’s helpful for authors is feedback which goes beyond “I don’t like it” and gets into the why of it: Why don’t we like it? Do we know? Even variations of “It’s too (whatever)” are un-helpful because authors need to know what and where.
For nearly 40 years my day job was to program computers. After retiring, I wrote a program to help novice critics (including myself) improve their critiquing craft by running the following program. It doesn’t require any more expertise than knowing what we like but also knowing how to describe what we don’t like:
Rather than write a lot in the book, I make tiny pencil marks in the margin to help me remember the spots I want to comment on later in the notes: "!" means I like it. "?" means I'm confused. "x" means a bug—i.e., one or more "PUGS" in the lit-biz lingo (a Punctuation, Usage, Grammar, or Spelling error).
Lewis Jenkins 2026.06.15
