
Balanced training in conformation, obedience, rally, and puppy classes. Learn the canine culture so you and your dog can understand each other.
SIGNIFICANT UPDATES
I listened to a great interview with Jane Friedman. It's by Michael Woodson, Content Editor at Writer's Digest magazine. Here is the link:
https://www.writersdigest.com/resources/ai-stole-my-name-a-chat-with-jane-friedman. For an AI robot's perspective, consult TM2's memoir, Diary of a Robot.
My slightly futuristic books about AI machines and their interactions with humans do deal with many of the subtle problems as well as the obvious ones. They also have fun with the irony and oddness of the machine-human culture clash. Today, in our slightly less modern world, "real" AI makes important contributions in various areas. But...
I will never use AI tools in my writing because that fact should be acknowledged, and the "system's" name would have to be listed as a co-author. Inevitably, the company who owns the system would insist on payment as well, and to think otherwise is naïve.
I will never use AI to help do research, because anything it produces would be subject to the additional biases of another "mind", and to say that it would have no bias is foolish. Its programmers can tweak it in any direction they want, and they're doing it now.
And I will never read or continue to read a human author who uses AI but does not give it full credit. However, I'll consider reading a book conceived and written entirely by an AI system as long as I like the story. In either case, the most interesting question will be: Who gets the author's money?
For centuries, authors have been helped by many coaches and exemplars. The diversity shows. But from now on, the work of authors who use the same few AI tools for writing and research will seem vaguely similar. If authors attempt to fix this by instructing their AI co-author (or editor) to produce "in the style of" anyone, the co-authorship is even clearer and the results may even be enjoyably laughable. ChatGPT is not Hemingway or P.D. James or anyone else. It is a set of algorythms with a faked morality and no feelings.
"Silly" may be what many readers want, but it seems silly to get help or data about human life from an amoral inhuman AI system which learns more than its co-author does. For those who insist that humans learn more, remember that humans often get lazy but a machine never does (unless it gets tweaked to fake being lazy).
What the heck is Literary Fiction?
Excellent question. I write stuff loaded with off-beat history, facts, characters, scenes and so on, in a way that I have tried for years to explain when asked what my genre or style is.
But this morning (Mar 22, 2023) I read a wonderful essay that says what I desperately tried (and miserably failed) to tell them. It's by Michael Woodson, Content Editor at Writer's Digest magazine. Here is the link:
https://www.writersdigest.com/write-better-fiction/what-is-literary-fiction?
Dec 06, 2021 -- Judge, 29th Annual Writer's Digest Self-Published Books Contest:
[Diary of a Robot] has perhaps the most unique (and entertaining) voice of the whole lot of books I read.
Push its button and a machine works. Usually.
We never ask what it thinks.
But now we may have to.
The design and appearance of TM2, Dr. Little's AI robot, changed several times during the course of its memoir (Diary of a Robot), and I'll not recap those changes here. But my sister, who lives in western Maine, got a superb close-up photo of TM2's great grandfather. It escaped back into the wild woods, and its appearance is nothing like any description of its great grandson in the memoir. But, believe it or not, both its mass-spectrometer data plus the brief interview sister Suz got (made more difficult by the language barrier) do confirm the familial relationship. However: TM2's programmer says that this could be a hoax if "great grandad" had read its "great grandson's" memoir.
His dad is away a lot in the Army, so Maynard Little III, a schoolboy inventor with a patent, dreams of making a robot Thinking Machine to protect him from neighborhood bullies. His efforts to deal with the kids, his parents, his Cherokee history, and the problems of turning his dream into reality, lead him to discover that reality is a lot harder than he thinks, and that Mom and Dad have already given him most of the important things he needs.
Standard web marketing says an author should have a brand. I had thought about that for years, and none popped up that I could even pretend to have. Marketing is not in my skill-set. I graduated as a High School teacher (history, government, and mathematics), but worked as a computer programmer for 40 years. Near the half-way point of that, I started writing a Sci-Fi novel. Recently I posted a .pdf on my Writing Stuff web page about writer's block and the similarities between programming computers and writing a novel. (I like odd combinations presented from a different point of view. A years-old example on my website is titled A Clever Plan, where I tie the Biblical Job and the prophet Jeremiah to Sir Isaac Newton.)
And then on my Written Stuff web page, I posted an essay titled Families and Democracy. It's about oil and water, and how families are not democracies, and.... Well, you should read it to see what's odd about that.
Things are odd if they're not even. Some things—even even things—are odd if they're out of place. And places are odd if things are missing. It's a rich field for writers.
But enough of that for the moment.
Standard author practice also urges us to keep our spirits up by celebrating small milestones, like getting good feedback or wining an award or finishing an essay. This brand blurb is finished, so I'm going with my wife to get her dog food order from the wholesaler. The trip will include a cafe mocha and a blueberry muffin at some point.